Stephanie Krent
Staff Attorney, Knight Institute
Stephanie Krent is a staff attorney at the Knight First Amendment Institute and a lecturer in law at Columbia Law School. Her work focuses on freedom of speech on social media and surveillance of marginalized groups, including the use of commercial spyware and the use of surveillance technologies in correctional facilities and at the border.
Krent successfully litigated PETA v. Tabak, a case that challenged federal health agencies’ practice of hiding social media comments that contained keywords associated with viewpoints critical of animal testing. She has authored numerous amicus briefs addressing the First Amendment implications of government censorship online.
Krent also leads several of the Institute’s projects at the intersection of privacy, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press. She leads the Knight Institute’s litigation in A.B.O. Comix v. County of San Mateo, which challenges a California county’s policy of digitizing and then destroying physical mail sent to people in its jails. She also led the Institute’s related litigation in Knight Institute v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, which sought records concerning the Bureau of Prisons’ digitization, retention, and surveillance of mail sent to people incarcerated in federal jails and prisons. She is a core member of the team seeking to hold NSO Group accountable for surveillance of members of the news organization El Faro in Dada v. NSO Group. She has also written several amicus briefs addressing warrantless searches of electronic devices at the border and leads the Institute’s related transparency litigation, Knight Institute v. DHS.
She has been quoted in The Washington Post, Reuters, The Hill, and The Intercept amongst other publications. Krent was previously a legal fellow for the Institute from the fall of 2019 until September 2020. Prior to joining the Institute, Krent clerked for Judge Edgardo Ramos of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and Judge Julio M. Fuentes of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. She also worked as an associate at Jenner & Block.
Krent is a graduate of Barnard College and Yale Law School. During law school, she received the Harlan Fiske Stone Prize and the Potter Stewart Prize for her participation in moot court. She also served as a comments editor on the Yale Law Journal.
Contact
Selected Projects
-
PETA v. Tabak
A lawsuit challenging health agencies’ practice of blocking social media comments containing keywords associated with viewpoints critical of animal testing
-
A.B.O. Comix v. San Mateo County
A lawsuit challenging the digitization and destruction of mail in San Mateo County’s jails
-
Knight Institute v. DHS
A FOIA lawsuit seeking records relating to searches of electronic devices at the U.S. border
Selected Work
-
Deep Dive
The Thwarted Promise of Digital Communication Behind Bars
-
Quick Take
"Pod Save the People" Podcast: "We Are Human (with Stephanie Krent)"
-
Deep Dive
NYC’s nightmarish plan to prohibit physical mail in jails should be abandoned
-
Deep Dive
Challenging Secrecy in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel
Contact
Selected Projects
-
PETA v. Tabak
A lawsuit challenging health agencies’ practice of blocking social media comments containing keywords associated with viewpoints critical of animal testing
-
A.B.O. Comix v. San Mateo County
A lawsuit challenging the digitization and destruction of mail in San Mateo County’s jails
-
Knight Institute v. DHS
A FOIA lawsuit seeking records relating to searches of electronic devices at the U.S. border
Writings & Appearances
-
-
Essays and Scholarship
A Safe Harbor for Platform Research
Knight Institute policy paper proposes legal protection for certain research and newsgathering projects focused on platforms
-
Quick Take
North Carolina Becomes the Latest State to Digitize Mail in Prisons
Program ratchets up surveillance and raises serious First Amendment concerns
-
Deep Dive
Writing to Someone in Prison? Uncle Sam May Keep a Copy.
Knight Institute lawsuit aims to bring new surveillance program to light
-
Analysis
Recently Released OLC Opinions From 1974 Shed Light on Current Legal Debates
Disclosure, not secrecy, should be the norm for OLC opinions