• Free Speech & Social Media
      • Privacy & Surveillance
      • Transparency & Democracy
    • Litigation
    • Research
    • Policy
      • Events
      • Reading Rooms
      • Blog
      • Video
      • Podcasts
      • The Knight Institute
      • Board
      • Staff
      • Visiting Scholars
      • Work With Us
      • Support Us
      • Contact
      • Press Room

Reading Room Document

Restrictions on a Federal Appointee's Continued Employment by a Private Law Firm

Federal conflict of interest laws, 18 U.S.C. §§ 202—209, and Department of Justice Standards of Conduct, 28 C.F.R. pt. 45, restrict the private practice of law by an attorney while employed by the Department of Justice. If the attorney is hired as a "regular government employee," i.e., expected to serve more than 130 days in any 365-day period, he will be prohibited from acting as an agent or attorney for anyone other than the United States in any matter in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest, and from receiving compensation for services rendered by himself or another in such matters. In addition, Department regulations prohibit the outside practice of law by Department of Justice employees, in the absence of a waiver. If the attorney is hired as a "special government employee," i.e., expected to serve 130 days or less in any 365-day period, he will be subject to representation and compensation restrictions only with respect to matters in which he has participated personally and substantially while in government or which are pending in the Department of Justice. The Department's regulation prohibiting the outside practice of law does not apply to special government employees. Under 18 U.S.C. § 208 all government employees must disqualify themselves from participating for the government in any matters in which they or their employers, among others, have a financial interest. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/file/23516/download.

August 1, 1983

The OLC's Opinions

Opinions published by the OLC, including those released in response to our FOIA lawsuit

Issues

Free Speech & Social Media

Free Speech & Social Media

Featured

Knight Institute Says Visa Revocations Over Charlie Kirk Criticism Are Unconstitutional

     

Privacy & Surveillance

Privacy & Surveillance

Featured

Appeals Court Revives Journalists’ Case Against Spyware Manufacturer NSO Group

Spyware manufacturers should be held accountable in U.S. courts for actions violating U.S. law, Knight Institute says

Transparency & Democracy

Transparency & Democracy

Featured

Knight Institute Seeks Immediate Release of Trump Administration Agreements with Major Law Firms

 Says records are key to public’s understanding of administration’s vindictive campaign against political opponents

Events

The Science of Chilling Effects

Online

The Science of Chilling Effects

Learn More

Sign up for news about First Amendment events, research, and litigation

  • Issues

    • Free Speech & Social Media
    • Privacy & Surveillance
    • Transparency & Democracy
  • Litigation
  • Research
  • Policy
  • Public Education

    • Events
    • Reading Rooms
    • Blog
    • Video
    • Podcasts
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2021 Knight First Amendment Institute. Design by Point Five. Development by Tierra Innovation. Icons by Leandro Castelao.

2020 Webby Award Winner for Law Website