Lawsuit
United States v. Trump
A motion to intervene in Trump classified documents case seeking release of Special Counsel’s report.
On February 24, 2025, the Knight Institute filed a motion to intervene asking Judge Aileen Cannon, who presided over the now-abandoned prosecution of President Trump under the Espionage Act, to release Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report about Trump’s mishandling of classified information at Mar-a-Lago. The public has an extraordinary interest in the report, which concerns allegations of grave criminal conduct by the nation’s highest-ranking official.
The Institute’s motion to intervene argues that a redacted copy of the report in the district court’s files should be made public under the First Amendment and common law right of access to judicial documents. The motion also asks the court to lift an injunction prohibiting the Department of Justice from releasing the report, which is blocking a Freedom of Information Act request for the report that the Knight Institute filed with DOJ on January 26, 2025.
On November 3, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that the Institute had established “undue delay” in the district court’s resolution of its motion to intervene. On December 22, 2025, Judge Cannon denied the motion to intervene. The Knight Institute appealed the next day. In February 2026, the Institute filed a second motion to intervene in the district court, arguing that Judge Cannon lacked authority to consider motions filed by President Trump and his co-defendants seeking the permanent suppression of the report. On February 23, Judge Cannon denied the Institute’s second intervention motion and permanently enjoined release of the report. The Institute appealed the denial and asked the Eleventh Circuit to consolidate the two appeals
Status: The Knight Institute’s motion to consolidate appeals remains pending before the Eleventh Circuit. Briefing is currently suspended, and the appeals have not advanced while the motion is under consideration.
Case Information: United States v. Trump, 9:23-cr-80101-AMC (S.D. Fla.), United States v. Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, 25-14507, 26-10674 (11th Cir.).
Press Statements
-
Judge Aileen Cannon “Permanently” Blocks Release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s Report in Trump Classified Documents Case
-
Knight Institute Asks Federal Appeals Court to Order the Release of Special Counsel’s Report in Trump Classified Documents Case
-
Judge Blocks Release of Special Counsel’s Report in Trump Classified Documents Case
-
Knight Institute Welcomes House Judiciary Committee’s Call for Release of Special Counsel’s Report in Trump Classified Documents Case
-
Appeals Court Finds Undue Delay, Orders Prompt Ruling in Trump Classified Documents Case
-
Knight Institute Asks Appeals Court to Compel Ruling in Trump Classified Documents Case
Legal Filings
Click to highlight response chains
-
11th Cir. (25-14507)
-
Appellants' Motion to Expedite (consideration of motion to consolidate appeals)
-
America First Legal Foundation's Amicus Brief (in support of Defendants)
-
Appellants' Reply
-
Defendants' Opposition
-
Appellants' Motion to Consolidate Appeals
-
Brief of Amici Curiae First Amendment Scholars (in support of Appellants)
-
Joint Appendix
-
Vol. I
-
Vol. II
-
Vol. III
-
Vol. IV
-
Knight Institute's Opening Brief
-
Order (granting motion to expedite)
-
Defendants' Response
-
Knight Institute's Motion to Expedite
-
-
11th Cir. (26-10503)
-
11th Cir. (25-13403)
-
S.D.Fl.
-
Knight Institute's Notice of Appeal
-
Order (denying joint motion to intervene to seek stay)
-
Opinion (granting permanent injunction against release of the report)
-
Knight Institute and American Oversight's Joint Motion to Intervene
-
Nauta and De Oliveira’s Motion (for an order permanently enjoining release of the report)
-
United States' Response (to 12/22/25 order)
-
President Trump’s Motion (for an order permanently enjoining release of the report)
-
Notice of Appeal
-
Order (addressing 1/21/25 order)
-
Order (denying motions to intervene)
-
Knight Institute's Reply
-
Government's Opposition
-
Defendants Nauta & De Oliveira's Opposition
-
Joint Status Report
-
Knight Institute's Motion to Intervene
-
Order (granting emergency motion)
-
Defendants Nauta & De Oliveira's Emergency Motion (to prevent release of Special Counsel Jack Smith's report)
-
Order (dismissing superseding indictment)
-
Superseding indictment of President Trump, Waltine Nauta, and Carlos de Oliveira
-