The OLC
Astrid Da Silva

The OLC's Opinions

Opinions published by the OLC, including those released in response to our FOIA lawsuit

This Reading Room is a comprehensive database of published opinions written by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). It contains the approximately 1,400 opinions published by the OLC in its online database and the opinions produced in Freedom of Information Act litigation brought by the Knight Institute, including opinions about the Pentagon Papers, the Civil Rights Era, and the War Powers Act. It also contains indexes of unclassified OLC opinions written between 1945 and February 15, 1994 (these indexes were created by the OLC and intended to be comprehensive). We have compiled those indexes into a single list here and in .csv format here. This Reading Room also contains an index of all classified OLC opinions issued between 1974 and 2021, except those classified or codeword-classified at a level higher than Top Secret (the OLC created this index, too, and intended it to be comprehensive).

The Knight Institute will continue updating the reading room with new records. To get alerts when the OLC publishes a new opinion in its database, follow @OLCforthepeople on Twitter.

Showing 171–180 of 2202

  • Immunity of the Director of the Office of Political Strategy and Outreach from Congressional Subpoena

    The Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Political Strategy and Outreach ("OPSO") is immune from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform's subpoena to compel him to testify about matters concerning his service to the President in the OPSO. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/olc/file/2014-07-15-immun-dir-ostp/download.

    7/15/2014

  • Prosecutorial Discretion Regarding Citations for Contempt of Congress

    A United States Attorney to whom a contempt of Congress citation is referred retains traditional prosecutorial discretion regardless of whether the contempt citation is related to an assertion of executive privilege. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/olc/file/2014-06-16-pros-disc-contempt-cong/download.

    6/16/2014

  • Obligation of Revolving Funds Requiring Reimbursement from Time-Limited Funds Under the Anti-Deficiency Act

    The Anti-Deficiency Act prohibits an agency from awarding a severable services contract that lasts longer than one year and obligates revolving funds that must be reimbursed with time-limited funds. The Anti-Deficiency Act violation caused by awarding such a contract is not undone by subsequently modifying the contract's term so as not to exceed one year. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/olc/file/2013-10-21-oblig-revolv-funds/download.

    10/21/2013

  • Sequestration of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Funds

    The operating funds of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board are subject to sequestration under section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, as amended, because the Board's funds have consistently been included in the President's budget, were not exempted from sequestration by Congress, and qualify as "budgetary resources" under the Act. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/olc/file/2013-09-13-sequest-pcaob/download.

    9/13/2013

  • Competitive Bidding Requirements Under the Federal-Aid Highway Program

    The competitive bidding requirement of 23 U.S.C. § 112 imposes, in addition to procedural rules dictating the process by which bids are awarded, a substantive limitation on state or local bidding requirements that are unrelated to the bidder's performance of the necessary work. Section 112's competitive bidding requirement does not preclude any and all state or local bidding or contractual restrictions that have the effect of reducing the pool of potential bidders for reasons unrelated to the performance of the necessary work. Rather, section 112 affords the Federal Highway Administration discretion to assess whether a particular state or local requirement unduly limits competition. Generally, state or local government requirements that eliminate or disadvantage a class of potential responsible bidders to advance objectives unrelated to the efficient use of federal funds or the integrity of the bidding process are likely to unduly impede competition in contravention of the substantive component of section 112's competitive bidding requirement. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/olc/file/2013-08-23-comp-bid-fha/download.

    8/23/2013

  • Whether the Millennium Challenge Corporation Is Subject to the Open Meeting Requirements of the Sunshine Act

    The Millennium Challenge Corporation is not an "agency" for purposes of the open meeting requirements of the Sunshine Act. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/olc/file/2013-05-03-mcc-sunshine-act/download.

    5/3/2013

  • Expiration of Authorizations of Appropriations for Social Security Administration Grant Programs

    Notwithstanding the expiration of the specific authorizations of appropriations for the Work Incentives Planning and Assistance program and the Protection and Advocacy for Beneficiaries of Social Security program, the appropriation for administrative expenses of the Social Security Administration remains available to fund those two grant programs. When an agency has legal authority to administer a program and appropriated funds are available for that purpose, the absence or expiration of an authorization of appropriations does not prevent the agency from expending funds on the program unless such a restriction is imposed by statute. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/olc/file/2013-02-04-expir-ssa-grant/download.

    2/4/2013

  • Certification of Peace Corps Response Volunteers for Noncompetitive Eligibility for Federal Employment Under Executive Order 11103

    Under Executive Order 11103, which describes a "full term of service" as "approximately two years" for purposes of noncompetitive eligibility for federal employment, the Director of the Peace Corps may not issue certificates of satisfactory service to volunteers in the Peace Corps Response program ("PCRVs") who serve between three and twelve months. The Director may not issue certificates of satisfactory service to PCRVs under the exception in Executive Order 11103 for those who do not complete a full term "due to circumstances beyond their control." The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/olc/file/2013-01-09-peace-corps-vols/download.

    1/9/2013

  • Residence Requirement for Assistant United States Attorneys Under 28 U.S.C. § 545(a)

    Under 28 U.S.C. § 545(a), Assistant United States Attorneys must physically reside in or within 25 miles of the district that they serve. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/olc/file/2012-11-20-res-req-ausas/download.

    11/20/2012

  • Authority of the Department of Labor to Control the Disclosure of Federal Employees' Compensation Act Records Held by the United States Postal Service

    The Federal Employees' Compensation Act gives the Department of Labor the authority to control and limit the disclosure of FECA records held by the United States Postal Service, and DOL's FECA regulations prohibit USPS from disclosing FECA records in a manner inconsistent with DOL's Privacy Act routine uses. The Department of Labor's regulatory regime for FECA records is consistent with and furthers the purposes of the Privacy Act. Neither the Postal Reorganization Act nor the National Labor Relations Act authorizes USPS to control the disclosure of FECA records. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/olc/file/2012-11-16-dol-usps-feca/download.

    11/16/2012

Related Content