The Knight Institute represented the Campaign for Accountability in a FOIA lawsuit challenging the Office of Legal Counsel’s failure to affirmatively disclose its “formal written opinions.”

The Office of Legal Counsel, or OLC, is a component of the Department of Justice that issues legal opinions that bind federal agencies on matters of significant public concern. These opinions are the authoritative law of the government on subjects ranging from warrantless surveillance, to the torture of detainees, to retirement benefits for federal employees. Although these opinions often implicate questions of overwhelming public concern, the OLC has published only a fraction of them.

The lawsuit argued that this practice violates FOIA’s “reading-room provision,” which obligates agencies to proactively disclose opinions or interpretations that have the force or effect of law. On April 19, 2024, the district court granted the Campaign for Accountability's cross-motion for summary judgment, holding that OLC opinions resolving interagency disputes fall within the affirmative-disclosure provision of FOIA.

Status: On October 17, 2025, the D.C. Circuit held that FOIA does not require the proactive disclosure of the OLC's legal opinions.

Case Information: Campaign for Accountability v. DOJ, No. 1:16-cv-01068-KBJ (D.D.C.), 24-5163 (D.C. Cir.).