Public Officials and Social Media
Through groundbreaking litigation such as Knight Institute v. Trump—a lawsuit challenging former President Trump's practice of blocking critics from his Twitter account—the Institute has been instrumental in establishing a basic principle: once public officials open up an online space for expressive activity to the public at large, the First Amendment prohibits them from excluding speakers on the basis of viewpoint. Courts throughout the country have invoked this case to preclude other public officials from silencing their social media critics.
This blog channel highlights the Institute’s ongoing work in this area and explores the many challenging First Amendment questions that continue to emerge.
-
Quick Take: Public Officials and Social Media
What Public Officials Need to Know About Posting on Social Media After Lindke v. Freed
An update to the Institute’s Social Media for Public Officials 101
-
Fact Sheet: Public Officials and Social Media
Social Media for Public Officials 2.0
A First Amendment guide for public officials using social media after Lindke v. Freed
-
Quick Take: Public Officials and Social Media
When It Comes to Social Media Blocking, Campaign Accounts are Different
Why true campaign accounts may not be First Amendment public forums
By Alyssa Morones & Katie Fallow -
-
Quick Take: Public Officials and Social Media
Platforms Not Required to Amplify Officials’ Harmful Speech, Argues Institute’s Litigation Director
But public interest dictates that even politicians’ ‘repugnant’ speech deserves a place on social media
By Bilal Choudhry -
Deep Dive: Public Officials and Social Media
Paxton Critics Blocked, Now Unblocked, from Texas AG’s Twitter Account
Texas AG unblocks critics in response to Knight Institute, ACLU of Texas lawsuit maintaining the account is a "public forum" under the First Amendment
By A. Adam Glenn -
-
Deep Dive: Public Officials and Social Media
Official Censorship Should Have No Place in the Digital Public Square
Courts are barring public officials from blocking critics from their social media accounts.
By Jameel Jaffer & Katie Fallow -
Quick Take: Public Officials and Social Media
Katie Fallow Talks to BBC News about First Amendment Issues Raised in Trump Impeachment Trial
During an interview with BBC Newshour on Feb. 8, Knight Institute Senior Staff Attorney Katie Fallow addressed First Amendment questions raised by the impeachment trial of former President Trump, which began today.
In response to a question from the BBC’s...
-
Quick Take: Public Officials and Social Media
A Third Federal Appeals Court Addresses Social Media Blocking
Agrees that public officials who use social media accounts to further their official duties must comply with the First Amendment
Litigation
Press Statement
Appeals Court Holds that Groups Lack Standing To Challenge U.S. Government’s Social Media Disclosure Requirement for Visa Applicants
Court decision is disappointing, but allows for possible continuation of lawsuit against unconstitutional surveillance regime, groups say
Learn MoreResearch
Essays and Scholarship
Protecting Immigrant Activists From U.S. Government Retaliation: Lessons From First Amendment Litigation
Immigrant activists in the U.S. face legal and structural barriers when fighting First Amendment retaliation.
Learn MoreResearch
Essays and Scholarship
AI as Normal Technology
Learn More
Litigation
Press Statement
Fourth Circuit Revives Challenge to Policy Silencing Immigration Judges
The independence of agencies charged with protecting employee rights has been compromised by Trump administration, court suggests
Learn More