
Rereading the First Amendment
The First Amendment is neither clear nor its future certain. Indeed, it is contradictory, ambiguous, and constantly evolving. But contemporary debates about the First Amendment are riddled with an oversimplified understanding of what it means. This is especially true in the context of new technologies. Cases developed in one institutional context are abstracted away to fit a new media environment—the result being, in many cases, a hollowing out of their meaning.
In this series of blog posts, Knight Institute visiting research scholars Genevieve Lakier and evelyn douek reread iconic First Amendment cases with the aim of complicating the false or incomplete assumptions that underlie so much of the conversation about free speech.
This is no mere academic exercise. It comes at an unpredictable inflection point for the First Amendment, when the shifting politics of the moment may rewrite the prevailing understanding of “freedom of speech.” Lakier and douek’s rereading of iconic and less well-known cases will not simply try to match old rules to new problems but rather explore which among the possible interpretations will best safeguard the values we think the First Amendment should protect.
-
Deep Dive: Rereading the First Amendment
Rereading Bluman v. Federal Election Commission
Foreigners have interesting and important things to say too
By evelyn douek & Genevieve Lakier -
Deep Dive: Rereading the First Amendment
Rereading Herbert v. Lando
Why exercising editorial discretion doesn’t exempt platforms from all transparency mandates
By evelyn douek & Genevieve Lakier -
Deep Dive: Rereading the First Amendment
Rereading Alvarez
It turns out the government can regulate lies … sometimes
By evelyn douek & Genevieve Lakier -
Deep Dive: Rereading the First Amendment
Rereading the First Amendment
Exposing the false assumptions that underlie contemporary First Amendment debates
By evelyn douek & Genevieve Lakier
Reading Room

Press Statement
Newly Released Office of Legal Counsel Opinions Shed Light on Nixon Administration’s Effort to Suppress Pentagon Papers and Prosecute Newspapers
Opinions among hundreds published for the first time in response to Knight Institute litigation
Learn MoreAdvocacy

Advocacy Project
Knight Institute, Scholars Advise SEC That Proposed Climate Rules Do Not Raise First Amendment Concerns
Leading First Amendment scholars sign onto Knight Institute letter addressing constitutionality of new rules
Learn MoreResearch

Press Statement
Arvind Narayanan and J. Nathan Matias to Join Knight Institute as Visiting Researchers
Narayanan will explore how algorithms distort online speech, and Matias will study human-algorithm behavior and free expression
Learn MoreResearch

Institute Update
Are We Climbing in or out of the Hole?
Artist Piotr Szyhalski on the making of the “Lies and the Law” series
Learn More